New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 727756 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jun 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

A zero-to-nonzero regression in media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2 at 475248:475251

Project Member Reported by liberato@google.com, May 30 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by liberato@google.com, May 30 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=727756

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDghvKztgoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win8-dual
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 30 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:locked_size_sum/video.html?src_smpte_3840x2160_60fps_vp9.webm_seek

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@475247      26858057 +- 100840777      21      good
chromium@475251      25278171 +- 123291836      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.smpte.3840x2160.60fps.vp9.webm.seek media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978150851327305424

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5812315502411776


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 30 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:locked_size_sum/video.html?src_smpte_3840x2160_60fps_vp9.webm_seek

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@475247      15798857 +- 100840777      21      good
chromium@475251      18958629 +- 75239725       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.smpte.3840x2160.60fps.vp9.webm.seek media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978136800370659808

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5812315502411776


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)

Sign in to add a comment