New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 727745 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 722064
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

8.3%-45.1% regression in media.android.tough_video_cases at 474413:474577

Project Member Reported by liberato@google.com, May 30 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 30 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.android.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : cpu_utilization/crowd.ogg_browser


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.android.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978151752443629040

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5245009512628224


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 31 2017

Cc: fsam...@chromium.org
Owner: fsam...@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author fsamuel@chromium.org ===

Hi fsamuel@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : fsamuel
  Commit : b520968f4ac40fb89ce25329134b388ca42cca12
  Date   : Thu May 25 03:10:42 2017
  Subject: cc::SurfaceDependencyTracker should not crash when a Display goes away

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.android.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : cpu_utilization/crowd.ogg_browser
  Change       : 33.39% | 5.3313577114 -> 7.1113718375

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@474467      5.33136 +- 0.277427      6      good
chromium@474522      5.42227 +- 0.322084      6      good
chromium@474536      5.50186 +- 0.127074      6      good
chromium@474538      5.45027 +- 0.569114      6      good
chromium@474539      7.09821 +- 0.168647      6      bad       <--
chromium@474540      6.97635 +- 0.240476      6      bad
chromium@474543      7.03664 +- 0.327365      6      bad
chromium@474550      7.08721 +- 0.222568      6      bad
chromium@474577      7.11137 +- 0.347611      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.android.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978148130526964288

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5245009512628224


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Mergedinto: 722064
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

Sign in to add a comment