Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
8.3%-45.1% regression in media.android.tough_video_cases at 474413:474577 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 30 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978151752443629040
,
May 30 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.android.tough_video_cases Metric : cpu_utilization/crowd.ogg_browser To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.android.tough_video_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978151752443629040 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5245009512628224 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 30 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978148130526964288
,
May 31 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author fsamuel@chromium.org === Hi fsamuel@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : fsamuel Commit : b520968f4ac40fb89ce25329134b388ca42cca12 Date : Thu May 25 03:10:42 2017 Subject: cc::SurfaceDependencyTracker should not crash when a Display goes away Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.android.tough_video_cases Metric : cpu_utilization/crowd.ogg_browser Change : 33.39% | 5.3313577114 -> 7.1113718375 Revision Result N chromium@474467 5.33136 +- 0.277427 6 good chromium@474522 5.42227 +- 0.322084 6 good chromium@474536 5.50186 +- 0.127074 6 good chromium@474538 5.45027 +- 0.569114 6 good chromium@474539 7.09821 +- 0.168647 6 bad <-- chromium@474540 6.97635 +- 0.240476 6 bad chromium@474543 7.03664 +- 0.327365 6 bad chromium@474550 7.08721 +- 0.222568 6 bad chromium@474577 7.11137 +- 0.347611 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.android.tough_video_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978148130526964288 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5245009512628224 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 31 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by liberato@google.com
, May 30 2017