New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 727661 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jun 2017
Cc:
jgruber@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

38.2%-225.3% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic at 459154:473847

Project Member Reported by jgruber@chromium.org, May 30 2017 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 30 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_avg/browse_media/browse_media_youtube

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@473781      9.1988 +- 7.35085       21      good
chromium@473846      9.57456 +- 7.56436      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978170923875934608

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5424390138757120


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 30 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_avg/browse_media/browse_media_youtube

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@473781      9.49841 +- 7.52451      21      good
chromium@473846      9.93738 +- 7.35073      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978155678850335568

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5424390138757120


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 31 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_avg/browse_media/browse_media_youtube

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@473738      16.9171 +- 8.23132      21      good
chromium@473832      16.2312 +- 8.41371      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978101138500714288

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4745757413867520


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 31 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_avg/browse_media/browse_media_youtube

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@473738      16.5717 +- 12.6669      21      good
chromium@473832      16.499 +- 7.52866       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978087732499640992

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4745757413867520


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 31 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_avg/browse_media/browse_media_youtube

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@473738      16.608 +- 7.93308       21      good
chromium@473832      16.7875 +- 6.62102      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978074648170186352

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4577169210081280


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 14 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 31 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_avg/browse_media/browse_media_youtube

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@473738      16.608 +- 7.93308       21      good
chromium@473832      16.7875 +- 6.62102      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978061308180873824

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4577169210081280


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 15 by jgruber@chromium.org, Jun 1 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Not reproducible and only affects classic pipeline, closing.
Project Member

Comment 16 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 1 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : API:duration_avg/browse_media/browse_media_imgur


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978101150819788672

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5025596142256128


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 18 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 1 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : API:duration_avg/browse_media/browse_media_imgur


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978008459741943776

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5025596142256128


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
►

Sign in to add a comment