Bug in storeColor |
|||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5304417640513536 Fuzzer: inferno_layout_test_unmodified Job Type: mac_asan_content_shell Platform Id: mac Crash Type: Bus Crash Address: 0x603000250000 Crash State: storeColor glgProcessColor __glgProcessPixelsWithProcessor_block_invoke Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=mac_asan_content_shell&range=429839:429929 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5304417640513536 Issue filed automatically. See https://dev.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security/bugs/reproducing-clusterfuzz-bugs for more information.
,
May 30 2017
This issue is a security regression. If you are not able to fix this quickly, please revert the change that introduced it. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
,
May 30 2017
,
Jun 2 2017
Bulk edit: removing sigbus crashes from the security queue.
,
Jun 3 2017
,
Jun 6 2017
From the regression range , this looks like an old issue. Possible suspect: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/db4fdf181e7064a8c7ab45aa29e19f3d07c56eb7 Adding respective component.
,
Jun 13 2017
trying to see report...
,
Jun 13 2017
I don't see any indicators that this is Skia.. perhaps someone on GPU more familiar with these command buffer calls might see something. will stay on cc but removing component for now.
,
Jun 13 2017
[Guessing this should be "bug", not "bus"]
,
Jun 16 2017
Need to be owner of bug to look at clusterfuzz report.
,
Jun 16 2017
Nothing stands out in the regression range. The test case is mostly a WebGL canvas. Also adding some stack tracing to provide more information: #3 0x7fff89222028 in _dispatch_client_callout2 #4 0x7fff892268c0 in _dispatch_apply_serial #5 0x7fff8921040a in _dispatch_client_callout #6 0x7fff892215a3 in _dispatch_sync_f_invoke #7 0x7fff89221c4b in dispatch_apply_f #8 0x7fff8d05641d in glgProcessPixelsWithProcessor #9 0x7fff83bc7b02 in gldDoScalingBlit #10 0x7fff83bc556b in gldBlitFramebufferData #11 0x7fff90432a0a in gleBlitFramebuffer #12 0x7fff9037010a in glBlitFramebufferEXT_Exec #13 0x7fff8ba2805c in glBlitFramebuffer #14 0x10ee0046d in gl::GLApiBase::glBlitFramebufferFn(int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int) ui/gl/gl_bindings_autogen_gl.cc:2627:3 #15 0x1103dd3f7 in gpu::gles2::GLES2DecoderImpl::DoBlitFramebufferCHROMIUM(int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int) gpu/command_buffer/service/gles2_cmd_decoder.cc:8327:5 #16 0x11036c86f in gpu::gles2::GLES2DecoderImpl::HandleBlitFramebufferCHROMIUM(unsigned int, void const volatile*) gpu/command_buffer/service/gles2_cmd_decoder_autogen.h:4135:3 #17 0x1103c180e in gpu::error::Error gpu::gles2::GLES2DecoderImpl::DoCommandsImpl<false>(unsigned int, void const volatile*, int, int*) gpu/command_buffer/service/gles2_cmd_decoder.cc:5276:18
,
Jun 16 2017
Issue 729337 has been merged into this issue.
,
Jun 16 2017
This is a bug in Apple's OpenGL driver in BlitFramebuffer / glBlitFramebuffer. If the values passed are too large then this can happen. zmo@ investigated this and we were considering generating GL_INVALID_OPERATION instead even though this might not be spec compliant. It's not a regression. It's also not a P1. There are plenty of ways the GPU process can be crashed (like via out-of-memory). Downgrading and marking Available.
,
Jul 16 2017
ClusterFuzz testcase 5304417640513536 is flaky and no longer reproduces, so closing issue. If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue.
,
Jul 23 2017
ClusterFuzz testcase 6495326642110464 is still reproducing on tip-of-tree build (trunk). If this testcase was not reproducible locally or unworkable, ignore this notification and we will file another bug soon with hopefully a better and workable testcase. Otherwise, if this is not intended to be fixed (e.g. this is an intentional crash), please add ClusterFuzz-Ignore label to prevent future bug filing with similar crash stacktrace.
,
Jul 24 2017
,
Mar 21 2018
ClusterFuzz testcase 6495326642110464 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified. If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue.
,
Apr 10 2018
|
|||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by sheriffbot@chromium.org
, May 30 2017