Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
38.1% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 475088:475223 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 30 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978194121665718336
,
May 30 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : sebmarchand Commit : 833aa96095e1f827ffc05af8bf545a094ffa6e35 Date : Sat May 27 01:34:31 2017 Subject: Changing default Windows compiler to VS2017 Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : node-type/node-type Change : 40.90% | 663.077995013 -> 391.882851297 Revision Result N chromium@475087 663.078 +- 8.47982 6 good chromium@475155 665.657 +- 2.60111 6 good chromium@475189 665.328 +- 1.53919 6 good chromium@475206 663.61 +- 1.48117 6 good chromium@475211 663.44 +- 1.56294 6 good chromium@475212 311.221 +- 141.656 6 bad <-- chromium@475213 279.782 +- 16.5575 6 bad chromium@475215 357.985 +- 227.603 6 bad chromium@475223 391.883 +- 228.724 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978194121665718336 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5214602486349824 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by toyoshim@chromium.org
, May 30 2017