Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
49.5% improvement in loading.desktop at 474966:475070 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 29 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978240278177872944
,
May 29 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : samans Commit : f26257b9ee4b7e722cc05468ceecbcf3f920be22 Date : Fri May 26 16:37:45 2017 Subject: Send BeginFrames for the renderer using Mojo Bisect Details Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.desktop Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/HatenaBookmark Change : 43.66% | 402.98466667 -> 227.02183333 Revision Result N chromium@474965 402.985 +- 108.099 6 good chromium@475018 404.699 +- 191.871 9 good chromium@475025 406.773 +- 125.489 6 good chromium@475028 392.56 +- 112.943 6 good chromium@475029 419.891 +- 28.1962 6 good chromium@475030 233.056 +- 151.07 6 bad <-- chromium@475031 229.398 +- 92.5059 6 bad chromium@475044 241.191 +- 218.526 9 bad chromium@475070 227.022 +- 76.7149 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=HatenaBookmark loading.desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978240278177872944 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6469830275760128 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by samans@chromium.org
, May 29 2017