Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
6.4% improvement in loading.desktop at 474970:475080 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 29 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978240303136088832
,
May 29 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : samans Commit : f26257b9ee4b7e722cc05468ceecbcf3f920be22 Date : Fri May 26 16:37:45 2017 Subject: Send BeginFrames for the renderer using Mojo Bisect Details Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.desktop Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/Naver Change : 5.36% | 2430.26822221 -> 2293.50433333 Revision Result N chromium@474969 2430.27 +- 41.9336 9 good chromium@475025 2397.01 +- 167.485 9 good chromium@475029 2397.96 +- 109.488 6 good chromium@475030 2289.17 +- 23.7694 6 bad <-- chromium@475031 2296.9 +- 44.8628 9 bad chromium@475032 2299.58 +- 93.6473 14 bad chromium@475039 2293.0 +- 28.551 14 bad chromium@475053 2291.58 +- 16.3653 9 bad chromium@475080 2293.5 +- 41.7667 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Naver loading.desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978240303136088832 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5906950274940928 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by samans@chromium.org
, May 29 2017