Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
54.6% improvement in loading.desktop at 474980:475122 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 29 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978240380059600672
,
May 29 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : samans Commit : f26257b9ee4b7e722cc05468ceecbcf3f920be22 Date : Fri May 26 16:37:45 2017 Subject: Send BeginFrames for the renderer using Mojo Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.desktop Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/HatenaBookmark Change : 44.87% | 257.599714286 -> 142.018857147 Revision Result N chromium@474979 257.6 +- 281.333 14 good chromium@475015 302.134 +- 44.5119 6 good chromium@475024 281.508 +- 159.982 9 good chromium@475029 277.729 +- 158.428 6 good chromium@475030 140.486 +- 25.4289 6 bad <-- chromium@475031 140.446 +- 30.7315 9 bad chromium@475033 139.679 +- 27.7403 6 bad chromium@475051 140.577 +- 33.0581 9 bad chromium@475122 142.019 +- 37.1485 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=HatenaBookmark loading.desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978240380059600672 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5221061580292096 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by samans@chromium.org
, May 29 2017