Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
54.2% improvement in loading.desktop at 474982:475124 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 29 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978240399709863792
,
May 29 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : samans Commit : f26257b9ee4b7e722cc05468ceecbcf3f920be22 Date : Fri May 26 16:37:45 2017 Subject: Send BeginFrames for the renderer using Mojo Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.desktop Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/HatenaBookmark Change : 46.20% | 253.631357143 -> 136.456222222 Revision Result N chromium@474981 253.631 +- 204.028 14 good chromium@475017 253.077 +- 136.683 9 good chromium@475026 247.659 +- 129.775 6 good chromium@475029 254.718 +- 142.004 9 good chromium@475030 135.179 +- 28.7012 6 bad <-- chromium@475031 132.959 +- 28.0819 9 bad chromium@475035 135.745 +- 26.7781 6 bad chromium@475053 134.302 +- 27.9396 6 bad chromium@475124 136.456 +- 40.2657 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=HatenaBookmark loading.desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978240399709863792 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4975526327877632 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by samans@chromium.org
, May 29 2017