Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
6.3% improvement in loading.desktop at 474980:475125 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 29 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978240430099227968
,
May 29 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : samans Commit : f26257b9ee4b7e722cc05468ceecbcf3f920be22 Date : Fri May 26 16:37:45 2017 Subject: Send BeginFrames for the renderer using Mojo Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.desktop Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/Naver Change : 5.09% | 2390.73766666 -> 2280.16866667 Revision Result N chromium@474979 2390.74 +- 109.156 9 good chromium@475016 2403.26 +- 139.723 14 good chromium@475025 2400.97 +- 139.47 9 good chromium@475028 2387.46 +- 116.348 9 good chromium@475029 2386.92 +- 112.603 6 good chromium@475030 2280.08 +- 12.6263 6 bad <-- chromium@475034 2278.08 +- 18.9233 6 bad chromium@475052 2306.76 +- 243.068 9 bad chromium@475125 2280.17 +- 19.6951 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Naver loading.desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978240430099227968 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5011131606761472 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by samans@chromium.org
, May 29 2017