New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 726946 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
█ briander...@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

5.3% regression in loading.mobile at 472397:472441

Project Member Reported by briander...@chromium.org, May 27 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by briander...@chromium.org, May 27 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=726946

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg-pGjpQkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-webview-nexus5X
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 27 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.mobile
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/Regular-3G/http___www.dailymotion.com_video_x3d1kj5_fallout-4-review_videogames

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@472396      88262.4 +- 4044.65      21      good
chromium@472441      88866.1 +- 2615.28      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.dailymotion.com.video.x3d1kj5.fallout.4.review.videogames loading.mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978488281816065872

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5587055582642176


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 27 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.mobile
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/Regular-3G/http___www.dailymotion.com_video_x3d1kj5_fallout-4-review_videogames

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@472396      88985.7 +- 2908.81      20      good
chromium@472441      89021.2 +- 4137.03      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.dailymotion.com.video.x3d1kj5.fallout.4.review.videogames loading.mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978442569781309936

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5587055582642176


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 13 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.mobile
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/Regular-3G/http___www.dailymotion.com_video_x3d1kj5_fallout-4-review_videogames

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@472300      89287.4 +- 2090.01      21      good
chromium@472499      88995.8 +- 2581.36      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.dailymotion.com.video.x3d1kj5.fallout.4.review.videogames loading.mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976998397639073968

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5225508112957440


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 14 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.mobile
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/Regular-3G/http___www.dailymotion.com_video_x3d1kj5_fallout-4-review_videogames

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@472300      88604.8 +- 3374.46      21      good
chromium@472499      88838.4 +- 3888.69      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.dailymotion.com.video.x3d1kj5.fallout.4.review.videogames loading.mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976940169696904144

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5225508112957440


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 10 by benhenry@chromium.org, Jul 27 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.
►

Sign in to add a comment