Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
14.5% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 472980:473157 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 23 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978801257888169728
,
May 23 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: b89328b48bc2ae3366c506cb32adb996e0493685 bad_revision : 2c4f825e2457eaaa9eed63daddf83822da88e864 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : dom-attribute-on-prototoype/dom-attribute-on-prototoype Revision Result N chromium@472979 24.9023 +- 1.06135 5 good chromium@473024 23.7633 +- 0.646893 6 bad chromium@473068 23.2895 +- 1.17743 6 bad chromium@473157 21.7221 +- 0.766264 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978801257888169728 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6399867003338752 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978759656486749632
,
May 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 6739a6938d0245598eb5458421da3aa1bd27b011 bad_revision : b72ebe3be808b64ca15ebff036511450b4a8fcff If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : dom-attribute-on-prototoype/dom-attribute-on-prototoype Revision Result N chromium@472979 24.8355 +- 0.387454 7 good chromium@472991 25.3514 +- 1.0112 6 good chromium@472997 25.1065 +- 1.22696 6 good chromium@472999 24.1055 +- 0.585031 6 bad chromium@473000 24.1014 +- 0.384805 6 bad chromium@473002 24.1177 +- 0.748443 5 bad chromium@473024 23.6129 +- 0.949716 6 bad chromium@473068 22.9587 +- 1.36263 6 bad chromium@473157 21.6408 +- 0.664627 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978759656486749632 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6399867003338752 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 12 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977000048299323760
,
Jun 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 55849b167c16bb7f87b5c747b02d27f531bc4086 bad_revision : 7bbea08f669df4f6dee69cd7b0629959ca372a37 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : dom-attribute-on-prototoype/dom-attribute-on-prototoype Revision Result N chromium@472800 13.8929 +- 0.595567 6 good chromium@473000 13.5577 +- 0.985804 6 good chromium@473100 13.9594 +- 0.723981 6 good chromium@473113 13.4237 +- 1.09589 6 good chromium@473119 13.7646 +- 0.891621 6 good chromium@473120 13.2618 +- 0.905348 6 good chromium@473120,v8@55849b167c 13.2203 +- 0.61012 6 good chromium@473120,v8@7bbea08f66 11.5256 +- 0.746909 6 bad chromium@473121 11.6175 +- 0.318416 6 bad chromium@473122 11.3656 +- 0.549231 6 bad chromium@473125 11.787 +- 0.434932 6 bad chromium@473150 12.1428 +- 0.595495 6 bad chromium@473200 12.2514 +- 0.615983 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977000048299323760 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5252956175204352 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976879755021520464
,
Jun 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 55849b167c16bb7f87b5c747b02d27f531bc4086 bad_revision : 7bbea08f669df4f6dee69cd7b0629959ca372a37 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : dom-attribute-on-prototoype/dom-attribute-on-prototoype Revision Result N chromium@472800 14.0155 +- 1.30592 9 good chromium@473000 13.7023 +- 1.22915 9 good chromium@473100 14.135 +- 0.763209 6 good chromium@473113 13.2033 +- 0.649879 6 good chromium@473119 13.9391 +- 0.468264 6 good chromium@473120 13.1949 +- 0.574325 6 good chromium@473120,v8@55849b167c 13.1842 +- 0.508825 6 good chromium@473120,v8@7bbea08f66 11.7975 +- 0.571157 6 bad chromium@473121 11.6947 +- 0.260114 6 bad chromium@473122 11.8254 +- 0.60413 6 bad chromium@473125 11.3909 +- 0.966015 6 bad chromium@473150 12.0501 +- 0.300789 6 bad chromium@473200 12.3284 +- 1.96164 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976879755021520464 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5252956175204352 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by pmeenan@chromium.org
, May 23 2017