Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.2% regression in scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases at 473152:473244 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 23 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978801289506542208
,
May 24 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author sadrul@chromium.org === Hi sadrul@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : sadrul Commit : 94a4ca46bbe956a4ae033e7e207c584abe1e3645 Date : Fri May 19 17:41:00 2017 Subject: input: Fix running the completion callback for telemetry gesture. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases Metric : mean_frame_time/mean_frame_time Change : 1.91% | 16.6645729167 -> 16.9832395833 Revision Result N chromium@473151 16.6646 +- 0.0453957 6 good chromium@473198 16.6639 +- 0.0349409 6 good chromium@473221 16.6882 +- 0.0449859 6 good chromium@473233 16.6721 +- 0.0269089 6 good chromium@473234 16.6762 +- 0.0407455 6 good chromium@473235 17.0176 +- 0.0681353 6 bad <-- chromium@473236 17.02 +- 0.12897 6 bad chromium@473239 17.0136 +- 0.0840941 6 bad chromium@473244 16.9832 +- 0.0885172 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978801289506542208 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5281266728960000 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 25 2017
crrev.com/472595 introduced a bug which would cause the test to terminate a little earlier than it should. That seems to have caused the 'mean frame time' metric to dip (from ~16.8 to ~16.6/16.7). The follow up CL (crrev.com/473235, referenced from the bisect above) fixes that. So the number is expected to go back up to ~16.8. Looks like the numbers went up a little too much though, to ~17.1/17.2, which now seems to have come back down to ~16.8 (since ~crrev.com/474058). So perhaps there was some other regression that has since been fixed? WontFix? /cc +dtapuska@, tdresser@
,
May 25 2017
Yeah, WontFix. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by pmeenan@chromium.org
, May 23 2017