Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
21.2% regression in page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif at 472339:472431 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978869691500772416
,
May 22 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : drott Commit : fbec38011870753cffb3cb2ff98aa0c00c63b25c Date : Wed May 17 10:49:03 2017 Subject: Reland: Compile FreeType with HarfBuzz support Bisect Details Configuration: linux_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.cnn.com Change : 19.58% | 186.958111109 -> 223.558000002 Revision Result N chromium@472338 186.958 +- 11.3974 9 good chromium@472385 189.381 +- 23.5833 8 good chromium@472408 184.563 +- 8.35203 9 good chromium@472411 183.138 +- 4.75904 6 good chromium@472412 187.014 +- 12.9709 6 good chromium@472413 230.837 +- 14.0119 5 bad <-- chromium@472414 223.322 +- 7.40362 6 bad chromium@472420 223.759 +- 12.1085 6 bad chromium@472431 223.558 +- 5.58773 4 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.cnn.com page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978869691500772416 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5892289915781120 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by benhenry@google.com
, May 22 2017