New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 725114 link

Starred by 3 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1%-8.1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 472980:473431

Project Member Reported by benhenry@google.com, May 22 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by benhenry@google.com, May 22 2017

Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 22 2017

Cc: adamk@chromium.org
Owner: adamk@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author adamk@chromium.org ===

Hi adamk@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Adam Klein
  Commit : 9397c1b73a607de3c836d9869527cf478668eb19
  Date   : Thu May 18 19:28:58 2017
  Subject: Revert "[parser] Refactor streaming scanner streams."

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_yandex
  Change       : 8.02% | 4981024.0 -> 5380642.0

Revision                           Result                  N
chromium@472979                    4981024 +- 18895.8      6      good
chromium@473033                    4983704 +- 25754.7      6      good
chromium@473047                    4983073 +- 41120.8      6      good
chromium@473051                    4987429 +- 40933.5      6      good
chromium@473053                    4982762 +- 22512.2      6      good
chromium@473053,v8@f4da43618c      4981804 +- 59425.8      6      good
chromium@473053,v8@6b5e443972      4979447 +- 34518.3      6      good
chromium@473053,v8@9397c1b73a      5415275 +- 76189.8      6      bad       <--
chromium@473054                    5419784 +- 110388       6      bad
chromium@473060                    5389399 +- 91932.3      6      bad
chromium@473087                    5395546 +- 86874.9      6      bad
chromium@473195                    5409055 +- 140358       6      bad
chromium@473410                    5380642 +- 137958       6      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.yandex system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978878338041107200

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5861076240957440


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Not going to ask anyone to unrevert a revert.
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 22 2017

Cc: jochen@chromium.org
 Issue 725007  has been merged into this issue.
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 24 2017

Cc: pmeenan@chromium.org
 Issue 725952  has been merged into this issue.

Sign in to add a comment