New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 725012 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: Duplicate
Owner:
jochen@chromium.org
Closed: Jun 2017
Cc:
jochen@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression

Blocked on:
issue 674945


Sign in to add a comment

1% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 470447:470531

Project Member Reported by jochen@chromium.org, May 22 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by jochen@chromium.org, May 22 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=725012

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg2uXIpAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgmprErwkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgqsvp5QoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-retina
chromium-rel-mac11
chromium-rel-mac11-pro
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 23 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_social


Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978900449418729568

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5905877380366336


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 25 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_social


Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978808731854426096

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5905877380366336


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 6 by simonhatch@chromium.org, Jun 2 2017

Blockedon: 674945
crbug.com/674945 lack of message for 24 hr timeout
Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 2 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_taobao

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@470444      12596381 +- 9217999      21      good
chromium@470494      14212016 +- 1333537      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.taobao system_health.memory_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977889155995081664

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4929477726961664


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 2 2017

Mergedinto: 721238
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : yhirano
  Commit : 91088a195969f5af61f404c9f02edc622cbe373a
  Date   : Wed May 10 05:49:31 2017
  Subject: Add Field Trial Testing Configuration for MojoLoading

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_social/load_social_facebook
  Change       : 4.38% | 23734621.3333 -> 24773448.0

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@470446      23734621 +- 508897       6      good
chromium@470484      23784080 +- 274735       6      good
chromium@470489      23824243 +- 410189       6      good
chromium@470490      24801412 +- 354116       6      bad       <--
chromium@470491      24721253 +- 304067       6      bad
chromium@470492      24636235 +- 151299       6      bad
chromium@470494      24713568 +- 324763       6      bad
chromium@470503      24801001 +- 68555.3      6      bad
chromium@470521      24773448 +- 373356       6      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.social.facebook system_health.memory_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977889351165539456

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5770873295863808


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 2 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_taobao

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@470444      12552798 +- 9088023      21      good
chromium@470494      14220988 +- 1203916      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.taobao system_health.memory_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977883889787015440

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4929477726961664


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 14 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 2 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : yhirano
  Commit : 91088a195969f5af61f404c9f02edc622cbe373a
  Date   : Wed May 10 05:49:31 2017
  Subject: Add Field Trial Testing Configuration for MojoLoading

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_taobao
  Change       : 13.05% | 12307639.2381 -> 13913752.0

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@470444      12307639 +- 8318118      21      good
chromium@470475      11961330 +- 8445271      21      good
chromium@470483      11859212 +- 5334498      9       good
chromium@470487      12303939 +- 6775966      14      good
chromium@470489      12569111 +- 6616409      14      good
chromium@470490      13980140 +- 703990       14      bad       <--
chromium@470505      13913752 +- 273219       14      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.taobao system_health.memory_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977889180790596752

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5339383701438464


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 2 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : yhirano
  Commit : 91088a195969f5af61f404c9f02edc622cbe373a
  Date   : Wed May 10 05:49:31 2017
  Subject: Add Field Trial Testing Configuration for MojoLoading

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_taobao
  Change       : 13.05% | 12307639.2381 -> 13913752.0

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@470444      12307639 +- 8318118      21      good
chromium@470475      11961330 +- 8445271      21      good
chromium@470483      11859212 +- 5334498      9       good
chromium@470487      12303939 +- 6775966      14      good
chromium@470489      12569111 +- 6616409      14      good
chromium@470490      13980140 +- 703990       14      bad       <--
chromium@470505      13913752 +- 273219       14      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.taobao system_health.memory_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977889180790596752

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5339383701438464


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
►

Sign in to add a comment