New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 725011 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

4.1% regression in v8.infinite_scroll-classic_tbmv2 at 470606:470740

Project Member Reported by jochen@chromium.org, May 22 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by jochen@chromium.org, May 22 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=725011

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg2vCbvAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac12-mini-8gb
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 22 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.infinite_scroll-classic_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/tumblr

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@470605      34536530 +- 2514991      21      good
chromium@470740      34528337 +- 2850189      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=tumblr v8.infinite_scroll-classic_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978900495715148720

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6361382821298176


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 22 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.infinite_scroll-classic_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/tumblr

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@470605      34469339 +- 2691182      21      good
chromium@470740      34684042 +- 3020352      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=tumblr v8.infinite_scroll-classic_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978876681729156384

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6361382821298176


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 6 by jochen@chromium.org, May 23 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
hum, since it's classic pipeline, I'm just gonna close this issue

Sign in to add a comment