New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 724954 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

6.5%-40.5% regression in v8.mobile_infinite_scroll-classic_tbmv2 at 472758:472979

Project Member Reported by jochen@chromium.org, May 22 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 3 by jochen@chromium.org, May 22 2017

Owner: jochen@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 22 2017

Cc: rmcilroy@chromium.org
Owner: rmcilroy@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author rmcilroy@chromium.org ===

Hi rmcilroy@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Ross McIlroy
  Commit : de4a4095cf22bc3c9cfa13eb5f8be28eb7a5f031
  Date   : Thu May 18 10:41:48 2017
  Subject: [Heap] Disable code flushing in preparation to remove it.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.mobile_infinite_scroll-classic_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_max/pinterest
  Change       : 25.84% | 29265002.0 -> 36825719.3333

Revision                           Result                   N
chromium@472757                    29265002 +- 3036751      6      good
chromium@472813                    29666391 +- 4085691      6      good
chromium@472841                    27767683 +- 3753868      6      good
chromium@472855                    28274198 +- 3713075      6      good
chromium@472855,v8@5e9939214e      29141529 +- 4251826      6      good
chromium@472855,v8@de4a4095cf      37964023 +- 3666898      6      bad       <--
chromium@472855,v8@cd1325a890      38729003 +- 6407613      6      bad
chromium@472855,v8@9fd599ef98      38578183 +- 2969892      6      bad
chromium@472856                    38672410 +- 395624       6      bad
chromium@472857                    37198151 +- 3229672      6      bad
chromium@472859                    37694319 +- 3489421      6      bad
chromium@472862                    37942701 +- 3568223      6      bad
chromium@472868                    36504045 +- 3797275      6      bad
chromium@472979                    36825719 +- 3775768      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=pinterest v8.mobile_infinite_scroll-classic_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978913292598351488

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5895277870841856


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 22 2017

 Issue 724955  has been merged into this issue.
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
This only effects the classic configuration (which won't be shipped after M59) so closing as wontfix.
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 30 2017

Cc: jgruber@chromium.org
 Issue 727516  has been merged into this issue.
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 30 2017

 Issue 727516  has been merged into this issue.

Sign in to add a comment