Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.5% regression in smoothness.tough_canvas_cases at 472268:472352 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionRef doesn't regress, looks like it could be real.
,
May 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979129690111819216
,
May 20 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Please try rerunning the bisect. If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.tough_canvas_cases Metric : frame_times/frame_times Revision Result N chromium@472267 23.5276 +- 0.177975 6 good chromium@472310 23.5641 +- 0.195559 6 good chromium@472331 23.6063 +- 0.138312 6 good chromium@472342 23.5792 +- 0.164987 6 good chromium@472347 23.5741 +- 0.0695053 6 good chromium@472347,v8@04ac13deef 24.0143 +- 0.350755 6 bad chromium@472347,v8@e92c52ba8a 24.0689 +- 0.0915212 6 bad chromium@472348 24.0748 +- 0.137582 6 bad chromium@472349 24.0478 +- 0.170799 6 bad chromium@472350 24.0346 +- 0.131543 6 bad chromium@472352 24.0047 +- 0.194478 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.tough_canvas_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979129690111819216 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6380679572488192 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 20 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979035225631786656
,
May 21 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Please try rerunning the bisect. If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.tough_canvas_cases Metric : frame_times/frame_times Revision Result N chromium@472267 23.5233 +- 0.107579 6 good chromium@472310 23.5842 +- 0.100617 6 good chromium@472331 23.5304 +- 0.205264 6 good chromium@472342 23.4372 +- 0.109661 6 good chromium@472347 23.5682 +- 0.217594 9 good chromium@472347,v8@04ac13deef 24.0663 +- 0.120976 6 bad chromium@472347,v8@e92c52ba8a 24.0281 +- 0.118062 6 bad chromium@472348 23.9779 +- 0.26379 6 bad chromium@472349 23.9624 +- 0.611446 9 bad chromium@472350 24.0469 +- 0.100976 6 bad chromium@472352 23.9912 +- 0.196097 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.tough_canvas_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979035225631786656 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6380679572488192 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 22 2017
Can you help us triage or take a look at the V8 roll for suspicious CLs?
,
Jul 14 2017
,
Aug 21 2017
Closing because this dropped down again. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by benhenry@google.com
, May 19 2017