New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 724140 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

6.3% regression in system_health.common_desktop at 468545:468596

Project Member Reported by tdres...@chromium.org, May 18 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=724140

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgqoDkoQsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

win-high-dpi
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_wikipedia

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468544      1755.0 +- 405.817       21      good
chromium@468596      1768.82 +- 445.038      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.wikipedia system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979245674790723712

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5772757956034560


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_wikipedia

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468544      1741.0 +- 328.192       21      good
chromium@468596      1738.64 +- 320.348      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.wikipedia system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979239049529191216

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5772757956034560


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_wikipedia

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468544      1753.74 +- 348.518      21      good
chromium@468596      1753.66 +- 258.584      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.wikipedia system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979165847572940400

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5852104121384960


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_wikipedia

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@468544      1761.53 +- 358.099      21      good
chromium@468596      1760.65 +- 304.52       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.wikipedia system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979159789871830848

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5852104121384960


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. 

Sign in to add a comment