New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 724119 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

44.1% regression in system_health.common_desktop at 471045:471120

Project Member Reported by tdres...@chromium.org, May 18 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=724119

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg6qLMnQsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

linux-release
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_games/load_games_alphabetty

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@471044      3188.38 +- 23366.2      21      good
chromium@471120      4123.25 +- 29193.7      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.alphabetty system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979246686877584176

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6449587356696576


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_games/load_games_alphabetty

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@471044      2317.66 +- 16856.2      21      good
chromium@471120      3387.93 +- 21734.0      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.alphabetty system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979242828338651456

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6449587356696576


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/load_media/load_media_9gag

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@471030      2813.0 +- 20410.4       21      good
chromium@471140      2985.32 +- 21079.1      20      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.9gag system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979165543961112464

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5843956299988992


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/load_media/load_media_9gag

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@471030      1544.17 +- 6819.18      21      good
chromium@471140      1416.28 +- 6750.52      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.9gag system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979159791195116592

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5843956299988992


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. 

Sign in to add a comment