New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 724102 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

24.8%-33.1% regression in loading.desktop at 471638:471654

Project Member Reported by tdres...@chromium.org, May 18 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=724102

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg6pHIpQsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgmvKCrwoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win10
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-ati
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/Daum

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@471638      572.687 +- 403.77       21      good
chromium@471654      582.761 +- 467.992      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Daum loading.desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979248935619285904

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6208732603613184


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/Daum

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@471638      566.346 +- 352.424      21      good
chromium@471654      597.186 +- 536.842      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Daum loading.desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979239035986540976

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6208732603613184


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/Economist

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@471630      391.128 +- 295.926      21      good
chromium@471650      353.251 +- 189.463      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Economist loading.desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979165928069438144

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5308544468910080


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/Economist

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@471630      372.041 +- 230.506      21      good
chromium@471650      352.329 +- 174.228      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Economist loading.desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979156020241396752

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5308544468910080


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. 

Sign in to add a comment