Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
14.2% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 470537:470608 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 18 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979252454381187056
,
May 18 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author pcc@chromium.org === Hi pcc@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : pcc Commit : c1269ce7fec8568a1789e07b2b5bb3b630a67f5f Date : Wed May 10 16:41:31 2017 Subject: build: Enable optimize_for_size unconditionally. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : append-child/append-child Change : 13.66% | 64.423068861 -> 55.6254445834 Revision Result N chromium@470536 64.4231 +- 0.418356 6 good chromium@470572 64.5541 +- 0.881196 6 good chromium@470590 64.1496 +- 0.866978 6 good chromium@470599 65.2344 +- 0.832419 6 good chromium@470604 64.9925 +- 0.386355 6 good chromium@470605 64.2904 +- 2.34106 6 good chromium@470606 55.5336 +- 0.416773 6 bad <-- chromium@470608 55.6254 +- 0.424646 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979252454381187056 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5841532596256768 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 18 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tdres...@chromium.org
, May 18 2017