New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 724047 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

9.3% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 470893:470943

Project Member Reported by tdres...@chromium.org, May 18 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=724047

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg6uqVpQoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5X
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_taobao

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@470892      40121611 +- 9399698      21      good
chromium@470943      39124130 +- 9630121      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.taobao system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979256524828651504

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5775080862253056


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_taobao

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@470892      39417290 +- 10002634      21      good
chromium@470943      39388864 +- 9361292       21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.taobao system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979250393736631712

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5775080862253056


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. 

Sign in to add a comment