New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 723896 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

6.4% regression in media.tough_video_cases at 471250:471297

Project Member Reported by hubbe@google.com, May 17 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by hubbe@google.com, May 17 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=723896

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgqtqK4wkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac11-pro
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_consumption_mwh/video.html?src_crowd720_vp9.webm

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@471249      26.1899 +- 1.30988      21      good
chromium@471297      26.7223 +- 10.7401      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.crowd720.vp9.webm media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979306813992339984

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5874344670003200


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 4 by hubbe@chromium.org, May 18 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_consumption_mwh/video.html?src_crowd720_vp9.webm

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@471249      25.9213 +- 1.58626      21      good
chromium@471297      26.8564 +- 22.3471      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.crowd720.vp9.webm media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979299462854135216

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5874344670003200


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment