Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
60.4% regression in webrtc.peerconnection at 471246:471282 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 17 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979357284920753968
,
May 17 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : webrtc.peerconnection Metric : cpu_utilization/cpu_utilization_browser Revision Result N chromium@471245 2.02754 +- 2.07062 21 good chromium@471282 2.1446 +- 1.18706 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests webrtc.peerconnection Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979357284920753968 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4541301174829056 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 17 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979348537926017472
,
May 17 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : webrtc.peerconnection Metric : cpu_utilization/cpu_utilization_browser Change : 22.37% | 1.66925297591 -> 1.32304479809 Suspected Commit Range 14 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/7f86224d3bc34aa39ea8cdd21ec590b6e2954806..36cc3da5e8b2360e246342351ee0959fb9e7ffea Revision Result N chromium@471245 1.66925 +- 1.55922 14 good chromium@471251 1.51961 +- 1.38953 21 good chromium@471252 --- --- build failure --- --- --- too many build failures to list chromium@471264 --- --- build failure chromium@471265 1.27158 +- 0.915227 14 bad chromium@471282 1.32304 +- 0.842563 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests webrtc.peerconnection Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979348537926017472 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4541301174829056 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Nov 1 2017
,
Nov 8 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by guidou@chromium.org
, May 17 2017