New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 723189 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.7%-49.4% regression in system_health.common_desktop at 470826:471037

Project Member Reported by lanwei@chromium.org, May 17 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 17 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_bbc

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@470825      2818.93 +- 20880.1      21      good
chromium@470972      3132.65 +- 20635.4      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.bbc system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979389290889452496

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4889514876600320


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 17 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_bbc

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@470825      2192.57 +- 16684.3      21      good
chromium@470972      3478.52 +- 24057.4      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.bbc system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979382513049814688

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4889514876600320


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Cc: tdres...@chromium.org
 Issue 724141  has been merged into this issue.
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_bbc

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@470825      1396.18 +- 5817.97      21      good
chromium@470972      1014.13 +- 1084.3       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.bbc system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979165705029694208

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5212434777767936


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_bbc

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@470825      2919.11 +- 22467.4      21      good
chromium@470972      3360.1 +- 22495.2       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.bbc system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979159795192895152

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5212434777767936


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 21 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_instagram

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@470941      129420917 +- 2994789      21      good
chromium@471037      129143413 +- 1716414      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.instagram system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976199455624995120

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6406054616760320


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 14 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 21 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_instagram

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@470941      129522878 +- 3691941      21      good
chromium@471037      129285505 +- 1815209      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.instagram system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976188964814040704

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6406054616760320


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)

Sign in to add a comment