Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10%-14.4% regression in blink_perf.layout at 470243:470381 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 16 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979405122624604192
,
May 17 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : wangxianzhu Commit : dba4d1702934a03d833c91f2c025faf2106b9c76 Date : Tue May 09 09:00:11 2017 Subject: Let table row and section's self visual overflow cover whole collapsed borders Bisect Details Configuration: linux_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.layout Metric : large-table-with-collapsed-borders-and-colspans-wider-than-table/large-table-with-collapsed-borders-and-colspans-wider-than-table Change : 8.70% | 178.554 -> 194.080666667 Revision Result N chromium@470248 178.554 +- 5.02893 6 good chromium@470266 180.439 +- 7.16122 6 good chromium@470267 182.697 +- 8.57193 6 good chromium@470268 199.499 +- 11.8546 5 bad <-- chromium@470269 192.879 +- 8.75475 6 bad chromium@470271 195.001 +- 7.56958 6 bad chromium@470275 195.168 +- 6.66439 6 bad chromium@470283 190.727 +- 3.95257 6 bad chromium@470318 194.081 +- 5.76548 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979405122624604192 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5024245551202304 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by lanwei@chromium.org
, May 16 2017