New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 722992 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

11.3% regression in blink_perf.layout at 471246:471282

Project Member Reported by lanwei@chromium.org, May 16 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by lanwei@chromium.org, May 16 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=722992

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgqrPGngoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-nvidia
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 17 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Error: INFRA_FAILURE

The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with:
  good_revision: 266ff75630ea0d2ea901fdc461089a529222f859
  bad_revision : 45bbf8041d5da434330f1417ca6881090831c89d

If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.layout
  Metric       : add-remove-inline-floats/add-remove-inline-floats

Revision                           Result                  N
chromium@471245                    69.9605 +- 3.31966      14      good
chromium@471264                    69.8153 +- 2.01         9       good
chromium@471273                    70.0411 +- 1.28828      9       good
chromium@471278                    69.7839 +- 2.91721      9       good
chromium@471280                    69.7387 +- 1.19724      9       good
chromium@471280,v8@5c66d6fcd4      69.7616 +- 1.72063      14      good
chromium@471280,v8@266ff75630      69.4921 +- 2.33034      9       good
chromium@471280,v8@45bbf8041d      70.6806 +- 2.97018      14      bad
chromium@471280,v8@cf37556f0e      70.657 +- 2.4938        14      bad
chromium@471281                    70.4172 +- 1.23351      9       bad
chromium@471282                    70.9387 +- 2.96344      9       bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979407664259928608

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6435226764443648


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Error: INFRA_FAILURE

The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with:
  good_revision: 619dfed4f706e8259802bed0a864c6ed820fda97
  bad_revision : 9fbfd6ead6f7406ca4912610c501146622fa98ea

If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.layout
  Metric       : add-remove-inline-floats/add-remove-inline-floats

Revision                           Result                  N
chromium@471245                    70.4283 +- 2.34293      14      good
chromium@471264                    69.8735 +- 1.67001      6       good
chromium@471273                    69.7886 +- 1.86232      6       good
chromium@471278                    69.7047 +- 2.80775      9       good
chromium@471280                    69.3717 +- 4.85091      14      good
chromium@471280,v8@b591fed43a      69.6959 +- 1.9818       14      good
chromium@471280,v8@619dfed4f7      69.9785 +- 3.1792       14      good
chromium@471280,v8@9fbfd6ead6      70.7289 +- 1.74575      9       bad
chromium@471280,v8@cf37556f0e      70.7725 +- 2.23667      14      bad
chromium@471281                    70.5687 +- 3.7059       14      bad
chromium@471282                    71.0671 +- 2.36534      14      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979314565432914096

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6435226764443648


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. 

Sign in to add a comment