New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 722915 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Nov 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

68.8% regression in media.tough_video_cases at 470308:470383

Project Member Reported by hubbe@google.com, May 16 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by hubbe@google.com, May 16 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=722915

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg6qH84goM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 16 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : seek/tulip2.mp4_seek_warm

Revision             Result                N
chromium@470383      50.925 +- 7.0043      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979418090213813600

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5556082392432640


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 17 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : seek/tulip2.mp4_seek_warm

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@470383      52.7086 +- 10.0517      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979401381450749920

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5556082392432640


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 17 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google
Components: Internals>Media
Labels: Performance-Media
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
WontFix. Bisect didn't work and bug is stale.

Sign in to add a comment