New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 722484 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Nov 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

16.7% regression in media.tough_video_cases at 471247:471290

Project Member Reported by hubbe@google.com, May 15 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by hubbe@google.com, May 15 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=722484

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg6tSNpAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win8-dual
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 15 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_consumption_mwh/video.html?src_tulip2.mp4

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@471246      91.9869 +- 15.2447      21      good
chromium@471290      90.7788 +- 3.34325      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.mp4 media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979504164219425296

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6635163397652480


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 16 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_consumption_mwh/video.html?src_tulip2.mp4

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@471246      86.3224 +- 16.8985      21      good
chromium@471290      85.9662 +- 8.00538      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.mp4 media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979491979975374672

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6635163397652480


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 17 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google
Components: Internals>Media
Labels: Performance-Media
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
WontFix. Bisect didn't work and bug is stale.

Sign in to add a comment