New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 722478 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Nov 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

18.9% regression in media.tough_video_cases at 471247:471290

Project Member Reported by hubbe@google.com, May 15 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by hubbe@google.com, May 15 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=722478

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgmuzBsAkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win8-dual
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 15 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_consumption_mwh/video.html?src_garden2_10s.mp4

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@471246      95.0035 +- 5.86452      21      good
chromium@471290      95.1335 +- 3.65257      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.garden2.10s.mp4 media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979504660524322960

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5797197561462784


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 15 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_consumption_mwh/video.html?src_garden2_10s.mp4

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@471246      95.0738 +- 6.29308      21      good
chromium@471290      94.6837 +- 3.5912       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.garden2.10s.mp4 media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979499534267544816

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5797197561462784


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 17 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google
Components: Internals>Media
Labels: Performance-Media
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
WontFix. Bisect didn't work and bug is stale.

Sign in to add a comment