Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
blink_style.polymer failure on chromium.perf at 471654 - 471708 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionRevision range first seen: https://test-results.appspot.com/revision_range?start=471654&end=471708 Link to failing step log: https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.perf/builders/Android%20Nexus5X%20WebView%20Perf%20%281%29/builds/3916/steps/blink_style.polymer Bots failing: Android Nexus5X WebView Perf (1) Android Nexus6 WebView Perf (1) Android Nexus7v2 Perf (1) If the test is disabled, please downgrade to Pri-2.
,
May 16 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author hayato@chromium.org === Hi hayato@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Test failure found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : hayato Commit : a7ab8a110bd6b5339c03a34a5a6bb9a419a49e60 Date : Mon May 15 06:33:13 2017 Subject: Make /deep/ as no-op and remove ::shadow in dynamic profile Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_style.polymer Metric : benchmark_duration/benchmark_duration Revision Exit Code N chromium@471654 0 +- N/A 20 good chromium@471681 0 +- N/A 20 good chromium@471683 0 +- N/A 20 good chromium@471684 1 +- N/A 20 bad <-- chromium@471685 1 +- N/A 20 bad chromium@471688 1 +- N/A 20 bad chromium@471695 1 +- N/A 20 bad chromium@471708 1 +- N/A 20 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_style.polymer Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979513578554434336 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5229489421811712 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 16 2017
Let me work on this. Basically, this wouldn't be a regression. I guess we have to update the benchmark so that it doesn't depend on /deep/ or ::shadow. I'll take a look.
,
May 16 2017
It looks this benchmark was already deleted: https://codereview.chromium.org/2885563002
,
May 17 2017
Issue 722796 has been merged into this issue. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, May 15 2017