Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
36.5% improvement in page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh at 470446:470516 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979532133396290064
,
May 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : yhirano Commit : 91088a195969f5af61f404c9f02edc622cbe373a Date : Wed May 10 05:49:31 2017 Subject: Add Field Trial Testing Configuration for MojoLoading Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.qq.com_ Change : 35.92% | 44.236 -> 28.3461666666 Revision Result N chromium@470445 44.236 +- 7.10361 6 good chromium@470481 41.915 +- 4.31791 6 good chromium@470486 43.4118 +- 5.37419 6 good chromium@470488 42.587 +- 4.36609 6 good chromium@470489 44.1665 +- 4.14752 6 good chromium@470490 29.1262 +- 3.31749 6 bad <-- chromium@470499 28.8552 +- 5.13067 6 bad chromium@470516 28.3462 +- 7.83842 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.qq.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979532133396290064 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4742915965845504 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by yhirano@chromium.org
, May 15 2017