Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
37.6% improvement in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic at 470443:470492 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979532182025218272
,
May 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : yhirano Commit : 91088a195969f5af61f404c9f02edc622cbe373a Date : Wed May 10 05:49:31 2017 Subject: Add Field Trial Testing Configuration for MojoLoading Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Metric : V8 C++:duration_avg/browse_chrome/browse_chrome_newtab Change : 36.29% | 3126.13766667 -> 1991.55933333 Revision Result N chromium@470442 3126.14 +- 397.084 6 good chromium@470467 3181.19 +- 323.56 6 good chromium@470480 3127.38 +- 343.207 6 good chromium@470486 3084.67 +- 332.196 6 good chromium@470489 3231.87 +- 78.9888 6 good chromium@470490 2149.91 +- 1356.32 6 bad <-- chromium@470491 2260.97 +- 975.763 6 bad chromium@470492 1991.56 +- 1056.95 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.chrome.newtab v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979532182025218272 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5744440464900096 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by yhirano@chromium.org
, May 15 2017