Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
45.2% improvement in system_health.common_desktop at 470446:470516 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979537558548557728
,
May 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979537548107266160
,
May 15 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author mastiz@chromium.org === Hi mastiz@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : mastiz Commit : 5730d628131f2ac3cd4a9a834a3fe812cc570ade Date : Wed May 10 05:42:54 2017 Subject: Verify favicon bitmap content in FaviconHandler tests Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/long_running_tools/long_running_tools_gmail-background Change : 29.61% | 758.991880953 -> 534.232785714 Revision Result N chromium@470445 758.992 +- 600.081 14 good chromium@470481 742.227 +- 681.366 14 good chromium@470486 796.869 +- 604.633 9 good chromium@470488 796.983 +- 607.999 9 good chromium@470489 722.426 +- 398.594 14 bad <-- chromium@470490 649.597 +- 1569.42 9 bad chromium@470499 633.064 +- 2110.21 9 bad chromium@470516 534.233 +- 732.474 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=long.running.tools.gmail.background system_health.common_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979537548107266160 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5292504108236800 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 15 2017
,
May 15 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author oshima@chromium.org === Hi oshima@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : oshima Commit : 48358e269fbafbae5df07b4a82f0a7762f1ce19b Date : Wed May 10 05:37:11 2017 Subject: Don't show rotation change notification in tablet mode unless it's changed by user. Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/long_running_tools/long_running_tools_gmail-background Change : 24.16% | 802.483380952 -> 608.563857143 Revision Result N chromium@470445 802.483 +- 1192.55 14 good chromium@470481 723.644 +- 635.185 14 good chromium@470482 762.157 +- 188.07 6 bad <-- chromium@470483 782.993 +- 878.576 14 bad chromium@470484 773.143 +- 540.578 14 bad chromium@470486 975.063 +- 1410.48 9 bad chromium@470490 652.815 +- 1848.68 9 bad chromium@470499 484.15 +- 551.146 9 bad chromium@470516 608.564 +- 1600.16 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=long.running.tools.gmail.background system_health.common_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979537558548557728 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6572503314464768 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 15 2017
,
May 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979508991296826224
,
May 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : yhirano Commit : 91088a195969f5af61f404c9f02edc622cbe373a Date : Wed May 10 05:49:31 2017 Subject: Add Field Trial Testing Configuration for MojoLoading Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/long_running_tools/long_running_tools_gmail-background Change : 31.46% | 692.595444444 -> 586.516962963 Revision Result N chromium@470445 692.595 +- 115.591 9 good chromium@470481 833.343 +- 623.145 9 good chromium@470486 767.892 +- 1037.38 14 good chromium@470488 851.343 +- 902.931 9 good chromium@470489 777.613 +- 677.415 9 good chromium@470490 522.854 +- 746.882 9 bad <-- chromium@470499 560.093 +- 1249.51 14 bad chromium@470516 586.517 +- 1220.99 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=long.running.tools.gmail.background system_health.common_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979508991296826224 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5840154750615552 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by yhirano@chromium.org
, May 15 2017