Integer-overflow in blink::NinePieceImageGrid::SetDrawInfoCorner |
|||||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6333812199129088 Fuzzer: ifratric-browserfuzzer-v3 Job Type: linux_ubsan_chrome Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Integer-overflow Crash Address: Crash State: blink::NinePieceImageGrid::SetDrawInfoCorner blink::NinePieceImageGrid::GetNinePieceDrawInfo PaintPieces Sanitizer: undefined (UBSAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_ubsan_chrome&range=470545:470729 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6333812199129088 Issue filed automatically. See https://dev.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security/bugs/reproducing-clusterfuzz-bugs for more information.
,
May 16 2017
Assigning to concern owner from Predator results -- The result is a list of CLs that change the crashed files. Author: eae Project: chromium Changelist: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/7b05f774342393172073a9da34325957dde1d007 Time: Wed May 10 16:14:04 2017 Lines 33-55, 88-93, 103 of file NinePieceImagePainter.cpp which potentially caused crash are changed in this cl (frame #2, "PaintPieces"; frame #3, "blink::NinePieceImagePainter::Paint"). Lines 857 of file BoxPainter.cpp which potentially caused crash are changed in this cl (frame #4, "blink::BoxPainter::PaintNinePieceImage"). Minimum distance from crash line to modified line: 0. (file: BoxPainter.cpp, crashed on: 857, modified: 857). @eae -- Could you please look into the issue, kindly re-assign if this is not related to your changes. Thank You.
,
May 16 2017
Doesn't look like it was caused by my change but I'll look into it. Pretty familiar with the code by now :)
,
Oct 1 2017
Automatically applying components based on information from OWNERS files. If this seems incorrect, please apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-Components label.
,
Nov 7 2017
,
Feb 27 2018
Non security int overflow bugs are considered WontFix for most blink code.
,
Mar 6 2018
ClusterFuzz testcase 6333812199129088 is still reproducing on tip-of-tree build (trunk). If this testcase was not reproducible locally or unworkable, ignore this notification and we will file another bug soon with hopefully a better and workable testcase. Otherwise, if this is not intended to be fixed (e.g. this is an intentional crash), please add ClusterFuzz-Ignore label to prevent future bug filing with similar crash stacktrace.
,
Mar 6 2018
,
Apr 10 2018
ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 549059:549062. Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6333812199129088 Fuzzer: ifratric-browserfuzzer-v3 Job Type: linux_ubsan_chrome Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Integer-overflow Crash Address: Crash State: blink::NinePieceImageGrid::SetDrawInfoCorner blink::NinePieceImageGrid::GetNinePieceDrawInfo PaintPieces Sanitizer: undefined (UBSAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_ubsan_chrome&range=470545:470729 Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_ubsan_chrome&range=549059:549062 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6333812199129088 See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information. If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
,
Apr 10 2018
ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 549059:549062. Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6333812199129088 Fuzzer: ifratric-browserfuzzer-v3 Job Type: linux_ubsan_chrome Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Integer-overflow Crash Address: Crash State: blink::NinePieceImageGrid::SetDrawInfoCorner blink::NinePieceImageGrid::GetNinePieceDrawInfo PaintPieces Sanitizer: undefined (UBSAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_ubsan_chrome&range=470545:470729 Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_ubsan_chrome&range=549059:549062 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6333812199129088 See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information. If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page. |
|||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||
Comment 1 Deleted