New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 721902 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Nov 2017
Cc:
jrumm...@chromium.org
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

10.1%-15.3% regression in media.tough_video_cases at 467800:467911

Project Member Reported by jrumm...@chromium.org, May 12 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by jrumm...@chromium.org, May 12 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=721902

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgitfO-QoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgyv6u4ggM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac11-air
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 13 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Error: INFRA_FAILURE

The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with:
  good_revision: 697a467f819ce09da5209a3df13b8b92f33e35a4
  bad_revision : c454c56eb566695c4f56909366f603bcc1c031ba

If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : idle_wakeups_gpu/idle_wakeups_gpu

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@467799      192.333 +- 4.0361       6      good
chromium@467855      186.753 +- 34.3184      9      good
chromium@467883      207.948 +- 24.617       9      bad
chromium@467911      210.7 +- 18.9096        6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979767619827061616

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5221561616826368


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 13 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Error: INFRA_FAILURE

The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with:
  good_revision: 697a467f819ce09da5209a3df13b8b92f33e35a4
  bad_revision : c454c56eb566695c4f56909366f603bcc1c031ba

If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : idle_wakeups_gpu/idle_wakeups_gpu

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@467799      192.333 +- 4.0361       6      good
chromium@467855      186.753 +- 34.3184      9      good
chromium@467883      207.948 +- 24.617       9      bad
chromium@467911      210.7 +- 18.9096        6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979752449185899168

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5221561616826368


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 6 by dtapu...@chromium.org, Oct 30 2017

Components: Internals>Media

Comment 7 by crouleau@chromium.org, Nov 14 2017

Labels: Performance-Media
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
WontFix. Bisect didn't work and bug is stale.
►

Sign in to add a comment