New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 721706 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Owner:
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

42.2% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile at 470416:470438

Project Member Reported by tebbi@chromium.org, May 12 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by tebbi@chromium.org, May 12 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=721706

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgqrT26AgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : Parse-Background:duration_avg/browse_social/browse_social_facebook

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@470415      519.044 +- 334.428      18      good
chromium@470438      499.954 +- 301.746      19      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979813279925651056

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5817641471574016


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 5 by tebbi@chromium.org, May 12 2017

Seems to be a flake. The fact that the graph did not recover might be related to chromium:721238
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : Parse-Background:duration_avg/browse_social/browse_social_facebook

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@470415      549.498 +- 293.268      21      good
chromium@470438      524.46 +- 257.721       20      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979805299813121920

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5817641471574016


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Owner: mvstan...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
Mergedinto: 712238
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)
This is likely 712238...
Did you merge this into the wrong bug?

Sign in to add a comment