Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
14.2% regression in blink_perf.paint at 470255:470307 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979891060772418288
,
May 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : nainar Commit : 5a563421457c31c1bb6cdac72c899db056f1adc7 Date : Tue May 09 10:04:48 2017 Subject: Move border-*-width out of BorderValue and store on SurroundData in ComputedStyle instead Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.paint Metric : large-table-collapsed-border-change/large-table-collapsed-border-change Change : 6.86% | 92.6800833333 -> 99.0353333333 Revision Result N chromium@470254 92.6801 +- 2.67989 6 good chromium@470268 87.0442 +- 0.544123 6 good chromium@470270 86.4218 +- 1.11841 6 good chromium@470271 86.2759 +- 0.857184 6 good chromium@470272 97.9053 +- 2.63195 6 bad <-- chromium@470275 97.9455 +- 1.31495 6 bad chromium@470281 98.7386 +- 2.24712 6 bad chromium@470307 99.0353 +- 2.99785 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.paint Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979891060772418288 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6337790733713408 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by hjd@google.com
, May 11 2017