Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
15.1% regression in blink_perf.paint at 470264:470326 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionLooks like maybe a revert.
,
May 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979900069174209008
,
May 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : nainar Commit : 5a563421457c31c1bb6cdac72c899db056f1adc7 Date : Tue May 09 10:04:48 2017 Subject: Move border-*-width out of BorderValue and store on SurroundData in ComputedStyle instead Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.paint Metric : large-table-collapsed-border-change/large-table-collapsed-border-change Change : 12.73% | 93.76375 -> 105.69825 Revision Result N chromium@470263 93.7638 +- 3.07118 6 good chromium@470271 94.5099 +- 1.44042 6 good chromium@470272 105.626 +- 3.78164 6 bad <-- chromium@470273 105.286 +- 1.8013 6 bad chromium@470275 104.91 +- 1.0046 6 bad chromium@470279 105.63 +- 3.05527 6 bad chromium@470295 106.525 +- 3.84129 6 bad chromium@470326 105.698 +- 2.41156 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.paint Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979900069174209008 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5291520929824768 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by hjd@google.com
, May 11 2017