New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 721293 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 721282
Owner: ----
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

38% regression in page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif at 470382:470440

Project Member Reported by hjd@google.com, May 11 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by hjd@google.com, May 11 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=721293

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg8svhgQsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac11
 Issue 721335  has been merged into this issue.
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Please try rerunning the bisect.


If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@470381      281.94 +- 183.629      14      good
chromium@470440      254.822 +- 163.53      14      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979900164035672592

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6421998936260608


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@470381      266.67 +- 224.407      21      good
chromium@470440      270.394 +- 211.83      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979809075092496672

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6421998936260608


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 7 by hjd@chromium.org, May 12 2017

 Issue 721294  has been merged into this issue.

Comment 8 by hjd@chromium.org, May 12 2017

Mergedinto: 721282
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

Sign in to add a comment