New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 721285 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

125.6% regression in page_cycler_v2.typical_25 at 470436:470447

Project Member Reported by hjd@google.com, May 11 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by hjd@google.com, May 11 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=721285

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgytvrowsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.typical_25
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.nationalgeographic.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@470435      167.827 +- 162.159      21      good
chromium@470447      162.127 +- 59.2816      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.nationalgeographic.com. page_cycler_v2.typical_25

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979900738132056864

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6370729173450752


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.typical_25
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.nationalgeographic.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@470435      161.464 +- 30.9403      21      good
chromium@470447      159.613 +- 25.4493      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.nationalgeographic.com. page_cycler_v2.typical_25

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979892115813601056

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6370729173450752


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 6 by hjd@chromium.org, May 11 2017

Mergedinto: 721238
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)
Status: WontFix (was: Duplicate)
We decided to not to care this change. See the internal doc:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wissv31WUjeHaSaf78uAH0FiFQfSU6sqv14Lcuo1toA/edit

Sign in to add a comment