New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 721283 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

12.6% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile at 469833:469836

Project Member Reported by tebbi@google.com, May 11 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by tebbi@google.com, May 11 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=721283

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgio25rAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5X
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : API:duration_avg/browse_shopping/browse_shopping_lazada

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@469832      234.058 +- 139.864      21      good
chromium@469836      240.475 +- 219.807      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.shopping.lazada v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979900798198207952

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5273025122926592


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 5 by tebbi@chromium.org, May 11 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
seems to be a flake
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : API:duration_avg/browse_shopping/browse_shopping_lazada

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@469832      237.351 +- 164.702      21      good
chromium@469836      241.374 +- 153.916      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.shopping.lazada v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979892121896359808

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5273025122926592


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment