Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
31.5% regression in page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif at 470446:470517 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979900821185558848
,
May 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : yhirano Commit : 91088a195969f5af61f404c9f02edc622cbe373a Date : Wed May 10 05:49:31 2017 Subject: Add Field Trial Testing Configuration for MojoLoading Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.fifa.com_ Change : 15.73% | 321.751555555 -> 372.353666668 Revision Result N chromium@470445 321.752 +- 36.4191 9 good chromium@470481 309.849 +- 50.7607 14 good chromium@470486 327.975 +- 335.613 14 good chromium@470488 315.646 +- 22.2587 6 good chromium@470489 316.43 +- 27.1758 6 good chromium@470490 373.864 +- 125.341 14 bad <-- chromium@470499 366.889 +- 168.769 14 bad chromium@470517 372.354 +- 128.473 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979900821185558848 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6442313863135232 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 12 2017
tzik@, can you look into this issue?
,
May 12 2017
Issue 721293 has been merged into this issue.
,
Jul 17 2017
,
Jul 24 2017
Gentle ping on this tzik@, would like to try and get this moved off the sheriff backlog. It looks like the graph never recovered https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgqsHXvgoM IIRC this happened at the same time as a bunch of other regressions/improvements due to mojo loading being turned on. Maybe we you link to the existing analysis here?
,
Jul 25 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by hjd@google.com
, May 11 2017