New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 721278 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 718807
Owner:
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

6.6% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic at 467800:467929

Project Member Reported by tebbi@google.com, May 11 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by tebbi@google.com, May 11 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=721278

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgiseTuwoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac12-mini-8gb
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : Total:duration_avg/browse_news/browse_news_flipboard

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@467799      8310.14 +- 15873.1      21      good
chromium@467929      7637.72 +- 8313.58      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.flipboard v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979900959723633680

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4983431584284672


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : Total:duration_avg/browse_news/browse_news_flipboard

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@467799      8273.72 +- 14196.1      21      good
chromium@467929      8203.15 +- 12273.3      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.flipboard v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979880797543017408

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4983431584284672


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Owner: tebbi@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)

Comment 7 by tebbi@chromium.org, May 12 2017

Mergedinto: 718807
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

Comment 8 by tebbi@chromium.org, May 12 2017

Cc: tebbi@chromium.org
 Issue 721277  has been merged into this issue.

Sign in to add a comment