New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 721089 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner:
drott@chromium.org
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
sullivan@chromium.org
█ benhenry@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

0.4% regression in sizes at 470273:470273

Project Member Reported by sullivan@chromium.org, May 10 2017 
drott, looks like https://codereview.chromium.org/2872903002 increased the binary size by about 500k. Is this expected?

+benhenry: how much do we care about this type of binary size regression on linux only?

Comment 1 by sullivan@chromium.org, May 10 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=721089

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgyqnErgkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

linux

Comment 2 by benhenry@chromium.org, May 11 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
I don't think this is a concern. Also, this change seems justified.

Comment 3 by benhenry@chromium.org, May 12 2017

Labels: -Binary-Size Performance-Size
►

Sign in to add a comment