Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.1%-4993.8% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 469971:470149 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979944818759356592
,
May 12 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979759991697371216
,
May 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_facebook Revision Result N chromium@469988 131072 +- 0.0 21 good chromium@470059 1483922 +- 11559991 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979759991697371216 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6362076089417728 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by sullivan@chromium.org
, May 10 2017