New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 721076 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Owner: ----
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.4%-128.1% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 470449:470497

Project Member Reported by sullivan@chromium.org, May 10 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile_stress
  Metric       : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@470448      17027346 +- 1162359       21      good
chromium@470490      26238039 +- 59563881      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979945259970550352

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5241528047370240


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 12 2017

Mergedinto: 721238
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : yhirano
  Commit : 91088a195969f5af61f404c9f02edc622cbe373a
  Date   : Wed May 10 05:49:31 2017
  Subject: Add Field Trial Testing Configuration for MojoLoading

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_news/browse_news_toi
  Change       : 9.69% | 228162218.667 -> 250272426.667

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@470432      228162219 +- 6128059       6      good
chromium@470473      228178603 +- 4875313       6      good
chromium@470483      228726101 +- 1555646       6      good
chromium@470488      228738389 +- 1684743       6      good
chromium@470489      228044800 +- 5839531       6      good
chromium@470490      248979456 +- 7491637       6      bad       <--
chromium@470491      248900267 +- 9759761       6      bad
chromium@470493      247124651 +- 11704270      6      bad
chromium@470513      250272427 +- 10231584      6      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.toi system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979796417883911808

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5804200774074368


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 12 2017

Mergedinto: -721238 721180

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : dominickn
  Commit : faace60759ac73ae60b5d4ef84fb85c65c937b4a
  Date   : Wed May 10 08:45:47 2017
  Subject: Add blocking permission prompts to the field trial testing config.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/background/after_http_m_intl_taobao_com_group_purchase_html
  Change       : 10.55% | 24925525.3333 -> 27555157.3333

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@470463      24925525 +- 14956.5       6      good
chromium@470492      22170965 +- 19612405      6      good
chromium@470507      25788416 +- 960318        6      good
chromium@470514      25794560 +- 967068        6      good
chromium@470518      22519808 +- 20015817      6      good
chromium@470520      25441621 +- 1284377       6      good
chromium@470521      27555157 +- 1939885       6      bad       <--

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979796476773352800

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5897252314284032


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 13 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile_stress
  Metric       : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@470448      16669172 +- 8184157       21      good
chromium@470490      24928171 +- 57072301      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979827949234908432

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5241528047370240


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 13 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : dominickn
  Commit : faace60759ac73ae60b5d4ef84fb85c65c937b4a
  Date   : Wed May 10 08:45:47 2017
  Subject: Add blocking permission prompts to the field trial testing config.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_dirty_size_avg/background/after_http_www_baidu_com_s_word_google
  Change       : 1.58% | 55821585.1429 -> 56524634.8571

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@470463      55821585 +- 3253697      14      good
chromium@470493      55653941 +- 4217955      14      good
chromium@470508      56121764 +- 1424216      14      good
chromium@470514      55303829 +- 6331390      21      good
chromium@470518      55290956 +- 3935834      9       good
chromium@470520      55131991 +- 5160987      14      good
chromium@470521      56524635 +- 949828       14      bad       <--

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979796468687487376

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5257580286312448


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 13 2017

Mergedinto: -721180 721238

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : yhirano
  Commit : 91088a195969f5af61f404c9f02edc622cbe373a
  Date   : Wed May 10 05:49:31 2017
  Subject: Add Field Trial Testing Configuration for MojoLoading

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/load_social/load_social_pinterest
  Change       : 38.57% | 33292416.0 -> 46134640.0

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@470445      33292416 +- 0.0           6       good
chromium@470471      33292416 +- 0.0           6       good
chromium@470484      33292416 +- 0.0           9       good
chromium@470488      33292416 +- 0.0           6       good
chromium@470489      33292416 +- 0.0           6       good
chromium@470490      43994269 +- 11723293      6       bad       <--
chromium@470491      42465433 +- 21707321      14      bad
chromium@470497      46134640 +- 0.0           9       bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.social.pinterest system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979796482510968288

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5857084169519104


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment