Issue 719885 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status:	Archived
Owner:	----
Closed:	Aug 2017
Cc:	mlippautz@chromium.org
EstimatedDays:	----
NextAction:	----
OS:	----
Pri:	2
Type:	Bug-Regression
Hotlist-Google M-60

62.3%-96.4% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile at 469740:469836

Project Member Reported by mlippautz@google.com, May 9 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by mlippautz@google.com, May 9 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=719885

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgyoKg6woM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgyvahlQgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgypOGqwkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5
chromium-rel-mac11

Project Member

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980082195999902976

Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_sum/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@469739      57.254 +- 74.2326       20      good
chromium@469835      61.3252 +- 60.0986      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980082195999902976

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5843050833641472


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980069899784023888

Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980069540868435456

Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_sum/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@469739      59.0462 +- 62.2415      20      good
chromium@469835      61.1497 +- 60.7351      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980069540868435456

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5843050833641472


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_sum/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@469700      61.6256 +- 45.0849      21      good
chromium@469855      61.627 +- 60.0197       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980069899784023888

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6121708982894592


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980058213731757168

Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_sum/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@469700      54.7466 +- 87.7027      20      good
chromium@469855      54.3319 +- 86.3153      20      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8980058213731757168

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6121708982894592


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 10 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979951872533716816

Project Member

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 10 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_sum/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@469700      58.1588 +- 72.1419      19      good
chromium@469870      56.3777 +- 73.5016      20      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979951872533716816

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6723918024409088


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 10 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979941190759118160

Project Member

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_sum/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@469700      56.3578 +- 72.2235      21      good
chromium@469870      59.981 +- 60.1423       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979941190759118160

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6723918024409088


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 14 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 15 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979501599838869760

Project Member

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 15 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_sum/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@469734      60.1738 +- 58.4973      21      good
chromium@469840      63.585 +- 47.8657       20      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979501599838869760

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6405818150289408


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 16 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 15 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979488207127008064

Project Member

Comment 17 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 16 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_sum/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@469734      60.5187 +- 61.4112      21      good
chromium@469840      54.8456 +- 74.7373      18      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8979488207127008064

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6405818150289408


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 18 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 17 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google

Comment 19 by mlippautz@chromium.org, Aug 25 2017

Status: Archived (was: Untriaged)

►

Issue 719885 link

Issue metadata

62.3%-96.4% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile at 469740:469836

Issue description

Comment 1 by mlippautz@google.com, May 9 2017

Comment 1 Deleted

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017

Comment 2 Deleted

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017

Comment 3 Deleted

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017

Comment 4 Deleted

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017

Comment 5 Deleted

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017

Comment 6 Deleted

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017

Comment 7 Deleted

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017

Comment 8 Deleted

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 9 2017

Comment 9 Deleted

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 10 2017

Comment 10 Deleted

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 10 2017

Comment 11 Deleted

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 10 2017

Comment 12 Deleted

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 11 2017

Comment 13 Deleted

Comment 14 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 15 2017

Comment 14 Deleted

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 15 2017

Comment 15 Deleted

Comment 16 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 15 2017

Comment 16 Deleted

Comment 17 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 16 2017

Comment 17 Deleted

Comment 18 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 17 2017

Comment 18 Deleted

Comment 19 by mlippautz@chromium.org, Aug 25 2017

Comment 19 Deleted

Sign in to add a comment